Product positioning is how you describe your product in a way that makes customers understand why it's different and why they should care.

Steve Saper
Founder & CEO of PM33. Building the agentic-PM platform and writing about how product management is being remade in the AI era.
Product positioning is how you describe your product in a way that makes customers understand why it's different and why they should care.
Most companies get this wrong. They describe features instead of positioning. "Our tool has 50 integrations" sounds like every other SaaS product.
April Dunford, positioning expert and advisor to scaling companies, has developed a framework that actually works. Her insight: positioning isn't marketing fluff. It's how customers understand the value of what you're selling.
I agree, however, most product teams treat positioning as a marketing problem. It's not. It's a product problem. If your product isn't meaningfully different, no positioning framework will save you.
Here's what April has learned: The best positioning starts with understanding who your product is for, what outcomes they care about, and how you're different.
April's framework has five essential components:
Who are you competing against?
This is more nuanced than you think. You might compete against different things depending on the customer:
Most positioning misses this. Define your competitive set from the customer's perspective, not yours.
What's genuinely different about how you solve the problem?
Note: It must be something your customers care about. Being different at something they don't value is pointless.
Examples of real differentiation:
Who benefits most from your differentiation?
Not "small teams." Specific: "marketing teams in B2B SaaS companies with 20-100 employees who measure ROI on every campaign."
The more specific, the stronger your positioning. Broad = weak positioning.
What specific outcome does your differentiation enable?
Not "productivity." Specific: "Spend 80% less time on manual campaign setup and optimization, so you can focus on strategic campaign creation."
Quantify the outcome when possible.
Why should customers believe you can deliver this outcome?
This might be:
April's process:
You say: "We have real-time collaboration, custom fields, and API access."
That's features. That's not positioning.
Positioning: "For technical teams, we're the only project management tool that treats code repositories as first-class citizens, so you can manage engineering workflows from within your development environment."
Fix: Don't list features. Describe the outcome and why you're uniquely suited to deliver it.
"We're for all B2B SaaS companies."
Too broad. Competitors will always win in some vertical.
"We're for marketing-led growth SaaS companies with $1M+ ARR that measure CAC payback period."
Much better. Now you own a specific positioning.
You see how Notion is positioned and copy their approach.
This guarantees you'll lose. They have all the advantages in their market.
Fix: Find a different competitive set. A different customer segment. A different value outcome. Own something unique.
Your positioning won't be perfect on day one. That's okay. Here's how it evolves:
Month 1: Initial positioning based on your hypothesis Month 2-3: Test with customers. What resonates? What falls flat? Month 4-6: Refine based on feedback. What outcomes do customers actually care about? Month 7-12: Lock in positioning once you see clear patterns
Based on my experience, don't change positioning too frequently. But do refine it as you learn.
Strong positioning answers five questions:
When all five are clear and aligned, your positioning is strong. When any are fuzzy, your positioning is weak.
Work through this framework. Test with customers. Refine. That's how great positioning is built.